"Because of the superior reliability of the lunar positions, researchers have carefully analyzed these 13 sets of lunar positions on VAT 4956. They analyzed the data with the aid of a computer program capable of showing the location of celestial bodies on a certain date in the past.19 What did their analysis reveal? While not all of these sets of lunar positions match the year 568/567 B.C.E., all 13 sets match calculated positions for 20 years earlier, for the year 588/587 B.C.E."
This is deceptive and misleading.
There are dozens of positions of planets in relation to constellations cited on the tablets. These are incredibly accurate and astronomers have used those positions and pinpointed 586/7 as Jerusalem's fall.
The position of a planet in relation to a constellation is like an astronomical fingerprint, and conjunctions of multiple planets in relation to a constellation are so unique, they may have not occurred at any other time in all of human history in that particular configuration.
Lunar eclipses are not rare and are far more easily open to interpretation and confusion.
Saying lunar eclipses are superior proof is more WT fudging to hang onto their beloved 607, without which, there is no beloved 1914.